Dispute Mechanism on Fliq

Fliq's Dispute System: What Traders Need to Know

We're launching a dispute system that lets you challenge market resolutions you believe are incorrect. Think a market was resolved wrong? Now you can do something about it.

How It Works

Step 1: Spot an Error

See a market resolution that contradicts the official source of truth? You can dispute it.

Step 2: Stake Your Conviction

• Click "Dispute" on the resolved market

• Stake 10 USDT (requires transaction approval)

• Only ONE person can dispute per market (first-come, first-served)

Step 3: Review Process

• Market settlement extends by 8 hours

• We review your dispute against the official source of truth

• Decision is made based on factual evidence

Step 4: Results

If you're RIGHT:

• Get your 10 USDT back

• Receive bonus rewards ( 25 USDT additional reward)

• Market resolution gets corrected

If you're WRONG:

• Lose your 10 USDT to the platform

• Original resolution stands

Important Rules

Settlement Time Extension

Once disputed, ALL markets extend to 8-hour settlement, which gets added additionally over the existing settlement time:

• Football markets (normally 1 hour) → 1+8 hours

• All other markets → 8 hours additional

• This prevents system abuse

One Dispute Per Market

• First person to dispute gets the slot

• No multiple disputes on same market

• Act fast if you spot an error

What Qualifies as a Valid Dispute

✅ Resolution contradicts official source of truth ✅ Clear factual error in outcome ✅ Market resolved against stated criteria

❌ You disagree with the result ❌ Your personal interpretation differs ❌ You lost money on the trade

Things to Remember

Before You Dispute

• Check the source of truth: Make sure the official source actually supports your claim

• Review market terms: Understand exactly what was being asked

• Be confident: You're risking 10 USDT

• Consider timing: You're extending settlement for all users

Common Mistakes

• Disputing because you lost money (not valid)

• Using different sources than what's stated (not valid)

• Misunderstanding what the market was asking (not valid)

• Emotional reactions to unexpected outcomes (not valid)

Best Practices

• Screenshot evidence from the official source

• Act quickly (first-come, first-served)

• Only dispute genuine errors

• Accept the final decision

Examples

Valid Dispute

Market: "Will Team A win the match?" Official Source: ESPN shows Team A won 2-1 Resolution: Team B declared winner Dispute: Valid - contradicts official source

Invalid Dispute

Market: "Will Team A win the match?" Official Source: ESPN shows Team B won 2-1 Resolution: Team B declared winner Your feeling: "Team A played better and deserved to win" Dispute: Invalid - you disagree with outcome, not resolution accuracy

More sports and automated systems coming soon. The dispute mechanism ensures everything stays accurate as we scale.