Dispute Mechanism on Fliq
Fliq's Dispute System: What Traders Need to Know
We're launching a dispute system that lets you challenge market resolutions you believe are incorrect. Think a market was resolved wrong? Now you can do something about it.
How It Works
Step 1: Spot an Error
See a market resolution that contradicts the official source of truth? You can dispute it.
Step 2: Stake Your Conviction
Click "Dispute" on the resolved market
Stake 10 USDT (requires transaction approval)
Only ONE person can dispute per market (first-come, first-served)
Step 3: Review Process
Market settlement extends by 8 hours
We review your dispute against the official source of truth
Decision is made based on factual evidence
Step 4: Results
If you're RIGHT:
Get your 10 USDT back
Receive bonus rewards ( 25 USDT additional reward)
Market resolution gets corrected
If you're WRONG:
Lose your 10 USDT to the platform
Original resolution stands
Important Rules
Settlement Time Extension
Once disputed, ALL markets extend to 8-hour settlement, which gets added additionally over the existing settlement time:
Football markets (normally 1 hour) → 1+8 hours
All other markets → 8 hours additional
This prevents system abuse
One Dispute Per Market
First person to dispute gets the slot
No multiple disputes on same market
Act fast if you spot an error
What Qualifies as a Valid Dispute
✅ Resolution contradicts official source of truth ✅ Clear factual error in outcome ✅ Market resolved against stated criteria
❌ You disagree with the result ❌ Your personal interpretation differs ❌ You lost money on the trade
Things to Remember
Before You Dispute
Check the source of truth: Make sure the official source actually supports your claim
Review market terms: Understand exactly what was being asked
Be confident: You're risking 10 USDT
Consider timing: You're extending settlement for all users
Common Mistakes
Disputing because you lost money (not valid)
Using different sources than what's stated (not valid)
Misunderstanding what the market was asking (not valid)
Emotional reactions to unexpected outcomes (not valid)
Best Practices
Screenshot evidence from the official source
Act quickly (first-come, first-served)
Only dispute genuine errors
Accept the final decision
Examples
Valid Dispute
Market: "Will Team A win the match?" Official Source: ESPN shows Team A won 2-1 Resolution: Team B declared winner Dispute: Valid - contradicts official source
Invalid Dispute
Market: "Will Team A win the match?" Official Source: ESPN shows Team B won 2-1 Resolution: Team B declared winner Your feeling: "Team A played better and deserved to win" Dispute: Invalid - you disagree with outcome, not resolution accuracy
More sports and automated systems coming soon. The dispute mechanism ensures everything stays accurate as we scale.
Last updated