# Dispute Mechanism on Fliq

We're launching a dispute system that lets you challenge market resolutions you believe are incorrect. Think a market was resolved wrong? Now you can do something about it.

### How It Works

#### Step 1: Spot an Error

See a market resolution that contradicts the official source of truth? You can dispute it.

#### Step 2: Stake Your Conviction

* Click "Dispute" on the resolved market
* Stake 10 USDT (requires transaction approval)
* Only ONE person can dispute per market (first-come, first-served)

#### Step 3: Review Process

* Market settlement extends *by* 8 hours
* We review your dispute against the official source of truth
* Decision is made based on factual evidence

#### Step 4: Results

**If you're RIGHT:**

* Get your 10 USDT back
* Receive bonus rewards ( 25 USDT additional reward)&#x20;
* Market resolution gets corrected

**If you're WRONG:**

* Lose your 10 USDT to the platform
* Original resolution stands

### Important Rules

#### Settlement Time Extension

Once disputed, ALL markets extend to 8-hour settlement, which gets added additionally over the existing settlement time:

* Football markets (normally 1 hour) → 1+8 hours
* All other markets → 8 hours additional
* This prevents system abuse

#### One Dispute Per Market

* First person to dispute gets the slot
* No multiple disputes on same market
* Act fast if you spot an error

#### What Qualifies as a Valid Dispute

✅ **Resolution contradicts official source of truth** \
✅ **Clear factual error in outcome** \
✅ **Market resolved against stated criteria**

❌ **You disagree with the result** \
❌ **Your personal interpretation differs** \
❌ **You lost money on the trade**

### Things to Remember

#### Before You Dispute

* **Check the source of truth**: Make sure the official source actually supports your claim
* **Review market terms**: Understand exactly what was being asked
* **Be confident**: You're risking 10 USDT
* **Consider timing**: You're extending settlement for all users

#### Common Mistakes

* Disputing because you lost money (not valid)
* Using different sources than what's stated (not valid)
* Misunderstanding what the market was asking (not valid)
* Emotional reactions to unexpected outcomes (not valid)

#### Best Practices

* Screenshot evidence from the official source
* Act quickly (first-come, first-served)
* Only dispute genuine errors
* Accept the final decision

### Examples

#### Valid Dispute

**Market:** "Will Team A win the match?" **Official Source:** ESPN shows Team A won 2-1 **Resolution:** Team B declared winner **Dispute:** Valid - contradicts official source

#### Invalid Dispute

**Market:** "Will Team A win the match?" **Official Source:** ESPN shows Team B won 2-1 **Resolution:** Team B declared winner **Your feeling:** "Team A played better and deserved to win" **Dispute:** Invalid - you disagree with outcome, not resolution accuracy

More sports and automated systems coming soon. The dispute mechanism ensures everything stays accurate as we scale.


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://docs.fliq.one/dispute-mechanism-on-fliq.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
